Friday, 16 October 2009

NAMA- The Greatest Scandal in the History of the State.

http://www.examiner.ie/ireland/nama-...es-103385.html

NAMA team still haven’t seen €77bn loan files
By Mary Regan Political Reporter
THURSDAY, OCTOBER 15, 2009

THE Government has still not seen the records or books of up to €77 billion worth of development loans that it will soon take over from the country’s banks.


Just weeks before the National Assets Management Agency (NAMA) is passed into law, the Department of Finance has admitted that its plans are based on
"aggregate data which has been provided by the institutions".

The department has not been able to "verify the integrity of the data" because "the NAMA team has not had direct access to individual transaction records and loan files".

The statement was made in the draft NAMA Business Plan published last night, which said that €15bn of loans taken over by the state will not be paid back by property developers.

The document said at least 20% of the loan sums owed to NAMA will default.

"Of the €77bn nominal value of loans acquired, €62bn will be repaid by borrowers and loan defaults or debt restructuring will occur on €15bn," it stated, adding these were "conservative and prudent assumptions".

Finance Minister Brian Lenihan told the Dáil the figures in the report "are liable to be adjusted further as the detailed analysis and due diligence is carried out".

The plan projected that by the time the NAMA plan is completed by 2020 and loans with interest are repaid, it will have made a profit of €4.8bn.

However, Fine Gael’s finance spokesman Richard Bruton said "the tooth fairy, the Easter Bunny and the Loch Ness Monster are all more credible propositions" than the figures that have been given in the business plan.

He said: "There is no analysis and no depth of information on how the rather extraordinary assumptions were arrived at."

The NAMA Bill last night survived its first vote in the Dáil.

The bill was approved by 77 to 73 on a second stage vote.

The business plan is expected to be passed into law by early November and the top 10 to 15 loans – which are worth a total of €16bn – will be transferred by the end of the year.

This means that "Christmas will come early for the top developers and bankers", according to Labour’s finance spokes-woman Joan Burton.

But Mr Lenihan said: "NAMA is not designed to be and will not be permitted to operate in practice as a bail-out mechanism for developers who have operated irresponsibly".

The Government hopes to have dealt with the top 32 loans – worth €24bn – by January, and the top 100 – worth €38bn – by February.

This story appeared in the printed version of the Irish Examiner Thursday, October 15, 2009


Okay boys and girls, lets put this in perspective. I want to buy a horse from a traveller at a fair. Instead of going to said fair and having a look at the horse I decide to give the traveller a ring on the phone. What's the horse like I ask, "Ah, sure she's great boss, worth a grand at least". "Okay, I reply, I'll give you 1,200 for the horse as I'm sure in the long term I'll get a great return out of her, heck I may even run her at the grand national if she's as good as you say"

Can anyone see the problem with this scenario. The government has priced the loan books of the banks and made on offer AND THEY DIDN"T EVEN AUDIT THE FECKING FILES, not even audit them but they still haven't even looked at them. What in the name of good god is going on. We are about to saddle our children with debt they cannot even fathom. We are about to pilfer their communion money, smash open their piggy banks and hand it in ernest to the bankers who drove this property bubble into the skies and then into the gound. The opposition only got their hands on this info last night in the Dail and are demanding rightly an unbiased audit of the loan books. Will it happen- God knows, but if it doesn't you may find that we are crystalising a level of debt that has no hope of return. And what are we getting for this investment? A stern warning from Brian Lenihan that the banks have a national duty to get the money rolling out to small businesses again but no concessions, no guarantees and no incentives. Why would they bother. Heck the banks can shut up shop and demand blood samples for a loan from now on if they want.

I am beyond shocked. I am beyond angry. They is no word in the English language that encapsulates the level of stupidity this government is showing. The closest analogy I can draw is a drunk wandering into a casino and betting his everything he owns or will ever own on the roulette wheel on zero and hoping blindly and frantically that the ball will somehow magically land there.

Ask the bookies for odds on that one.



Friday, 8 May 2009

The Shhhhhhhhhhh Word.

There is a word that, historically, is not discussed in the media. Its stigma is an ancient one. You can curse to your hearts content after the watershed but you'll never get this past the censors. The word is suicide. I heard reported on the radio on newstalk when I was driving today that there are more deaths in Ireland from suicide than fatalities on the road. That shocked me. Ireland, with it's gum ball rally roads that were sneezed onto an undulating landscape. A country where our politicians say a few drinks are grand and “ah, sure nothing wrong with it with getting into the car to drive home.” A country where you can fail your driving test with no driving experience, be certified dangerous on the road and then get in your car and drive home? This faraway land has more people killing themselves that the perverse concrete lottery scythes down? Wow.

I had to dig out some statistics. Here's a study done by Paul Corcoran and Ellen Arensman. Kudos. Yoink. 


The Results showed that the number of suicides in Ireland doubled between 1987 and 1998. They appear to level off between 1998 and 2003 and per the Irish Association of Suicidology (yes, they exist) they seem to have stayed at this plateau. Their stats are here:


The statistics scared the shit out of me. For example there is a column for 5-14 year olds. As a father that column really scares me. 

Suicide is one of those weird things that we as mortal beings have to get our perverbial heads around. Whether we like to admit it or not we've all flirted with the idea. Don't believe me? Have a discussion over the water cooler with your mates on how they would like to die. Everyone has an opinion. Some are drowners, some are going to “in my sleep”, others, like myself, are the massive coronary heart attack thank you very much. We cannot go on burying our heads in the sand and pretending it doesn't exist. It's a human condition but suicide carries with it an enormous stigma. They cheated. 

The thing about suicide is there is no point trying to rationalise it. It's not rational. It's generally impulsive and its finality is probably not grasped by those that undertake it. It's perceived effects are the full myriad or human emotions. We see copycat suicides presumably by those that seek attention. Suicides that seek to hurt others but mostly suicide is undertaken by those that want a way out. The ultimate Zanax to make the pain go away. Fuck this, I'm outta here. But the thing is, when you're dead you're not coming back and all the supposed hurt and attention you were seeking to escape it's no longer yours. It's passed onto those that are left picking up the pieces and trying, and sometimes failing to emotionally glue them together again. 

When I started this article I thought I was in the red zone. The high risk 20-30 male, and all the intangible pressures that supposedly go with it but digging out the stats I'm only marginally at risk than the little old lady down the street. This affects all of us and shiney coloured pie charts don't dimish the real pain of said little old ladys kids when Mommy tops off after popping off to Bingo.

Suicide exists. It's been here for as long as humans developed self awareness. Putting our fingers in our ears won't make it go away. A culture of don't ask, don't tell is no longer acceptable. It needs to be addressed. It needs to be taken out of the veil of secrecy and mysticism. We need to talk about death and not glorify it. I mean, this is the week Republicans are celebrating the suicide of ten political prisoners who starved themselves to death. Is this the image we want to impart on vulnerable people of suicide? When we do not have public debate on the issues we do not have a balanced and educated view to form an opinion on. The study above was remarkable for two things that seem to have been lost on the authors. I'll quote

“Either-way decriminalization would be presumed to lead to an increase in suicide whereas the reported number of suicide deaths that occurred in 1993 was actually 10% lower than in 1992 a rare decrease”

What the authors didn't seem to appreciate is that the decriminisation of suicide brought it into the remit of public debate. People talked openly about it. The families of suicide victims spoke openly of the stigma and pain and suffering and whole hearted trauma of it all and 10% listened and thought better and then instead of learning from the experience we all went back to pretending again. 

The second point the authors missed, and this is obvious, is their own bigotry. Decriminisation would be presumed to lead to an increase? Are you mental? Oh, yipee I can kill myself and not go to jail. What? Do you think someone about to commit suicide gives a fiddlers fuck about the legal consequences of death. Sure, sue me. There is an inherent misunderstanding right there of the very nature of suicide and this from the authors of a study on same. It makes me wonder. 

And because I'm an unqualified half-wit who obviously doesn't know what he's talking about I'll reproduce the myths of suicide from the IAS webpage. Take care out there.

http://www.ias.ie/myths.htm

Myths About Suicide
 Those who talk about suicide are the least likely to attempt it - NOT TRUE. About 80% of those who take their own lives will have talked about it to some significant other in the few months before hand.

If someone is going to complete suicide they are going to do it and there is nothing you can do about itNOT TRUE. The majority of those who take their own lives are ambivalent about doing so until the end. Most people who complete suicide do not want to die they just want to end their pain.

 You can get a good idea how serious someone is about a suicide attempt by looking at the method used NOT TRUE. Most people have little awareness of the lethality of what they are doing. The seriousness of the attempt is not necessarily related to the seriousness of the intent.

If someone has a history of making cries for help then they won't do it for real - NOT TRUE. The group of people at highest risk for suicide is those who have attempted it in the previous year.

Only the clinically depressed make serious suicide attempts - NOT TRUE People are also at risk suffering from other forms of psychiatric illness and emotional distress.

Those with personality disorders attempt suicide to manipulate others - a commonly held belief. Many a patient is alienated and an ideal opportunity for therapeutic intervention missed because of the reception they receive in some emergency departments.

If someone is going to commit suicide they will not tell anyone of their intentions and prepare well in advance - NOT TRUE. Many suicides are completed on impulse.

Talking about suicide encourages it - NOT TRUE. Raising the issue of suicide with those who are depressed or distressed may open the door to therapeutic intervention.

Suicide can be a blessed relief no just for the individual but those surrounding him or her - NOT TRUE. Bereavement by suicide is a very heavy cross to bear; those bereaved by suicide have special needs and need support. Bereavement by suicide is itself a risk factor for suicide.




Wednesday, 6 May 2009

Soccer Dictatorships- a New reign of Terror

Soccer Dictatorships- a new reign of terror?
We all remember staying up till 3 am with school the next day, hollow eyed addicts to a premiership manager game. “Just one more game”, we would cry, playing God in the transfer market and assembling a team that won the champions league final for some reckless underdog in a matter of 6 electronic seasons. For me it was Championship Manager 97 and I went all the way with Peterborough, dragging them from the pit of near extinction to Champions League glory.
This was all well and good in the electronic version with one omnipotent being but suddenly the premiership has turned into a playground for the rich and mysterious. Manchester United, Chelsea, Liverpool, Man city have all fallen under the financial axe and been resurrected as playthings for characters as diverse as the owners of Monty Burns nuclear softball league. Arsenal plough a lonely furrow as the only one of the big 4 not under the iron thumb of a rich owner, but for how long? Salary caps and a fantastic manager and scouting network have helped them maintain their position but what happens when the genius of Arsene Wenger has moved on. This trend led to Portsmouth to issue the nonsensical press statement over the weekend that the club was “not for sale”, but they would talk to prospectors looking to mine it, “at the right price”. It doesn’t take an oxymoron to know that the directors have raised the white flag and are waiting for the Allies to come and rescue them.
Rather than go into the characters of the new owners and their tastes and favourite colours, their other playthings and their motives which has been examined in every tabloid in England since this whole football experiment started I’d like to see where this rabbit hole goes and you’ll bear with me while Alice tumbles.
The ridiculous spending in the premiership means that a Scottish goalkeeper- albeit a good one commands a £12 million fee a newly promoted side, of course this is Gordon in Sunderland. The following season they attempt buy over a third of Tottenham’s starting line up. Where did the cash come from? Were hotdogs suddenly £50 in the North? Why weren’t Newcastle made aware of this unique inflation? The answer we learn is that Niall Quinn and his silent consortium have a “sugar daddy” in the background dispensing sweets like a UK version of Paz who is coughing up this money no questions asked. Naturally these owners are looking to improve the standing of the clubs, to earn riches at the biggest sweetshop of the lot- The Champions League. Make no mistake Benetiz’s head was on the block if Liverpool and Kuyt hadn’t smashed in the winner with extra time ticking perilously and Reina getting ready to saddle up Silver to perform another Lone ranger miracle for the pool. 
But what happens when you have a premiership of 5, 10, 15 obscenely wealthy owners wriggling like eels in the Jacuzzi and all dropping pennies in the slot machine. What happens when the effects of all this money is cancelled out? Suddenly the soccer superstars have an option. Robinho goes to Man City, how much would you have gotten in Boylesports on that one last season? Or will they start outbidding each other for the worlds top talent ala Ronaldo and the £300,000 a week rumours with the agents and players delirious and rich and assured of a death by gout.
Will money eventually cease to matter and we go back to coaching and other methods to get ahead? 
There are a number of theories on this. Firstly, common sense will dictate that whoever has the most money can afford the top players and managers. However, the echelon of both these professions is a narrow pyramid. Once you have committed to a top manager you have committed to his vision at a club, which means his players which may not always be mutually exclusive. As Chelsea learned with the Shevchenko you cannot just start buying up players because you used have their poster on your palace as a child, you have to have a well balanced team. The Glaziers subscribed to this idea early and let Alex run his show. A double over Chelsea in the league and Champions league final has shown this to be a pragmatic and sensible decision. You cannot just “buy success” unless what you buy is the tool mason of a manager to do it. It’s like the old adage, money doesn’t buy you happiness, but it helps. It is no surprise that Mourinho’s departure took the title success with him. Hughes is a top manager for the premiership, but not yet world class and it’ll be interesting to see what develops of Man City and who he brings in January. I’d expect to see some quality defenders for a start.
Regardless of the manager, if you have far superior players you will win 98 times out of a hundred (the 2% is what makes sport great). The rolling out of the reserves as started by Ferguson has devalued the Carling/FA cup sure but Arsenal’s reserves nearly went the whole way. Try telling them that their victories were lessened against teams in the old fourth divisions that would knife their grannies for TV appearance money that may be the difference between their next buy, hopeful promotion or the abyss of relegation. 
Secondly the players are finite. There are not enough Ronaldo’s or Lampards to fill ten teams. This makes the scramble all the more interesting. I do expect to see bidding wars but there are other considerations. This is not fantasy football where players come willingly and not all players are mercenaries. Some players are attracted to clubs because they love them. For cultural reasons Barcelona and Real Madrid are dreams of many the Latin American or Portuguese and Spanish youngster. So too AC and Inter, Juventus and Roma stick in the heart for the Italians. No amount of money could prise these happy players away from their spiritual football homes and what’s the difference between £100,000 and £200,000 to the young who think that these days will last forever and the money will never dry up. Sure they might start getting old and will sell their reputation and name to an English club but will they sell their passion and hearts. How many Anelka’s do you want in your team? If they are not inspired how can they inspire in their football? When it just becomes another job for money, albeit monopoly money will they still pass go? Deco could fit in this category but I think Scolari had a lot to do with his move, though I’m sure the money helped.
If you build it, most will come, but not all and I haven’t even mentioned the weather!
The third consideration is the money itself. These investors did not start buying up these teams to catch a seat with a decent view or a nice spot to have a cocktail party. These clubs are businesses. For successful astute businessmen every venture is a business decision. Sure they can pawn it off as an emotional purchase to the fans who are mired in the mystery of their own club like a man who loves his wife and doesn’t care when she’s let herself go. There may not be enough carcasses for all the vultures though television money ensures that they will circle the carcasses long enough to find out. If money starts to negate money will the super rich look for other more equitable interests? Funnily enough with a recession looming a football club is an astute buy. People will always look to sport in times of economic strife, remember the 80’s? Also the sheer wealth of some of the new owners ensures they could afford if the clubs become money oubliette but not perhaps for Sunderland’s sugar daddy or Hicks and Gillete who must surely be walking the streets of New York in fishnets trying to whore Liverpool at this stage with all their cash tied up in now defunct US investments.
The last consideration is the equivalent of football socialism. The commoners revolt. Like the old Russians who overthrew the Czar before their decedents became one and bought Chelsea, and the French revolution no-one in England has modelled their club on the continental version of fans as the owners. Liverpool’s supporters are now trying desperately to emulate the model but the amount of cash they need to raise to overthrow Napoleon and the rest of the pigs in the farmhouse is absolutely obscene and far beyond the realm of the common farm animal, who generally has no pockets. The Barcelona and Real Madrid supporters got in before the boom and it might take a bust in Liverpool before they can stride through the wreckage but somehow I think the vultures will get their first. The European clubs liked to brag that this model was represented at each of the last ten Champions League finals. Well that argument is dead now with Chelsea and Manchester United contesting last years final
Where they may win the debate is that the fans aren’t going to pull the plug. What happens when Abramovich decides to walk away. Financial melt down and receivership is what. Sort of like what David O Leary did at Leeds, only 100 million or so times worse.
So where to from here? Thankfully nobody knows. Chelsea’s balance sheet shows that the seed capital needed to push a club into the realm of champions is immense pushing the club into the red but this itself will not guarantee success. Will this act as a deterrent to further takeovers? It doesn’t seem to matter. The hoard of Russian Mafioso on the stands of the Champions League final in Chelsea shirts means that Russia has adopted a new club. The revenue Chelsea generated in selling football shirts in eastern Europe with a quintessential eastern European celebrity, Shevchenko on the back of them probably made up financially for his football flop in the premiership. Not since Beckham fanatics in the Far East licking his toilet bowls have we seen a model for flogging merchandise so effectively. Real Madrid became the richest club in the world when they bought footballs most over-rated player almost overnight from shirt sales in the Orient. How long before an Indian or Chinese tycoon decides those markets are ripe to start buying football kits of their newly nationalised premiership team?  
We have entered a new golden age. Football has always been about tycoons and money, maybe it’s gone back to its roots. 

Back Home in Derry

Today is the 28th anniversary of Bobby Sands death. One year longer than he lived. I hadn't given it much thought at all until I clicked on a link in Boards and found my way to the lyrics of “ Back home in Derry”. Bobby Sands wrote that. I hadn't known until today. Maybe music draws on my heart more than politics on my mind but it made me re-examine my views or rather my lack of them on Bobby Sands.

Bobby Sands has become an icon. He is a lot of things to a lot of people. A terrorist, a poet, a criminal, an elected representative, a martyr, a freedom fighter, a fanatical political kamikaze breaking onto the bough of Thatcher's conservative government, but behind it all when you whittle away the romanticism, Bobby Sands was a person. A fellow human being who wrote that beautiful mournful lament and laid down his life for the courage of his convictions in the most agonising of ways. That takes a strength of will few of us could contemplate.

I wasn't even born when Bobby and his fellow nine dead hunger strikers took up their protest for political prisoner status. Their views seem as alien to me now as the Catholic civil rights repressions in the North that preceded it. Suffice to say they were a product of their interactions with their environment in much the same way their environment was to become a product of their actions. I'm not going into a subjective debate on the rights and wrongs, the scoring system in blood that has raged in the North since 1969. I'm simply not qualified. I'm trying to deduce, when they dust down the annuals of history what effect Bobby and his fellow hunger strikers had on the North and the rest of us that share this island. 

The immediate after effect of Bobby Sands and his fellow prisoner's deaths was polorisation. Riots, murders and anarchy reigned. Divisions were drawn that still exist to this day. However, what is more subtle and also more pertinent to this day is the democratic election of Bobby Sands to Westminster as MP for Fermanagh and South Tyrone. Bobby's election gave the IRA a new weapon in the north. A democratic mandate. It is this weapon that has eventually usurped the rest of their arsenal and has give hope and peace to the North. It was in Bobby's election that many of the Nationalists cut their teeth in politics and they've been grinding them in a fury ever since. 

I'm drawn back to the lyrics of his lament. The story of the 1803 rising. Of prisoners brought to Van Halen's land in chains and lamenting their home. There are many that chose to leave the North during the troubles, but to many, it was, and is, for all its flaws, home. Home is a word that resonates in the heart greater than all others. I think of Bobby Sands writing those lyrics and contemplating leaving it behind. Leaving Derry for England to his young wife and son, but he chose to stay, and eventually, he chose to die. It is impossible to know what he would have made of the consequences of his actions. Only Bobby Sands would know that, but the political mediation infrastructure that was seeded in his election eventually bore fruit to the current assembly and brought hope to the North. It is a legacy few of us could have accomplished in 27 short years.

R.I.P

In 1803 we sailed out to sea
Out from the sweet town of Derry
For Australia bound if we didn't all drown
And the marks of our fetters we carried
In the rusty iron chains we sighed for our wains
As our good women we left in sorrow
As the mainsails unfurled our curses we hurled
On the English and thoughts of tomorrow
VERSE 2
at the mouth of the Foyle, bid farewell to the soil
as down below decks we were lying
O'Doherty screamed, woken out of a dream
by vision of bold Robert dying
the sun burnt cruel, as we dished out the gruel
Dan O'Connor was down with a fever
sixty rebels today, bound for Botany bay
how many will reach their receiver
Oh Oh Oh Oh I wish I was back home in Derry
Oh Oh Oh Oh I wish I was back home in Derry
VERSE3
I cursed them to hell as our bow fought the swell
Our ship danced like a moth in the firelight
White horses rode high as the devil passed by
Taking souls to Hades by twilight.
Five weeks out to sea we were now forty-three
Our comrades we buried each morning.
In our own slime we were lost in a time.
Endless night without dawning.
Oh Oh Oh Oh I wish I was back home in Derry
Oh Oh Oh Oh I wish I was back home in Derry
VERSE 4
Van Dieman's land is a hell for a man
To live out his life in slavery
Where the climate is raw and the gun makes the law
Neither wind nor rain cares for bravery
Twenty years have gone by and I've ended my bond
My comrades' ghosts walk behind me
A rebel I came and I'm still the same
On the cold winds of night you will find me
Oh Oh Oh Oh I wish I was back home in Derry
Oh Oh Oh Oh I wish I was back home in Derry
oh oh oh oh I wish i was back home in Derry

Monday, 23 February 2009

What's the hardest part of a Vegtable to eat?

This popped into my inbox today, it may be a bit painful to read but hold your incredulity for later and we’ll have a think about this one.

What would you do? You make the choice. Don't look for a punch line,
there isn't one. Read it anyway. My question is: Would you have made
the same choice?

At a fundraising dinner for a school that serves learning-disabled
children, the father of one of the students delivered a speech that
would never be forgotten by all who attended. After extolling the
school and its dedicated staff, he offered a question: 'When not
interfered with by outside influences, everything nature does is done
with perfection. Yet my son, Shay, cannot learn things as other
children do. He cannot understand things as other children do. Where
is the natural order of things in my son?'

The audience was stilled by the query.

The father continued. 'I believe that when a child like Shay,
physically and mentally handicapped comes into the world, an
opportunity to realize true human nature presents itself, and it
comes in the way other people treat that child.'

Then he told the following story:

Shay and his father had walked past a park where some boys Shay knew
were playing baseball. Shay asked, 'Do you think they'll let me
play?' Shay's father knew that most of the boys would not want
someone like Shay on their team, but the father also understood that
if his son were allowed to play, it would give him a much-needed
sense of belonging and some confidence to be accepted by others in
spite of his handicaps.

Shay's father approached one of the boys on the field and asked (not
expecting much) if Shay could play. The boy looked around for
guidance and said, 'We're losing by six runs and the game is in the
eighth inning. I guess he can be on our team and we'll try to put him
in to bat in the ninth inning.'

Shay struggled over to the team's bench and, with a broad smile, put
on a team shirt. His Father watched with a small tear in his eye and
warmth in his heart. The boys saw the father's joy at his son being
accepted. In the bottom of the eighth inning, Shay's team scored a
few runs but was still behind by three. In the top of the ninth
inning, Shay put on a glove and played in the right field. Even
though no hits came his way, he was obviously ecstatic just to be in
the game and on the field, grinning from ear to ear as his father
waved to him from the stands. In the bottom of the ninth inning,
Shay's team scored again. Now, with two outs and the bases loaded,
the potential winning run was on base and Shay was scheduled to be
next at bat.

At this juncture, do they let Shay bat and give away their chance to
win the game? Surprisingly, Shay was given the bat. Everyone knew
that a hit was all but impossible because Shay didn't even know how
to hold the bat properly, much less connect with the ball.

However, as Shay stepped up to the plate, the pitcher, recognizing
that the other team was putting winning aside for this moment in
Shay's life, moved in a few steps to lob the ball in softly so Shay
could at least make contact. The first pitch came and Shay swung
clumsily and missed. The pitcher again took a few steps forward to
toss the ball softly towards Shay. As the pitch came in, Shay swung
at the ball and hit a slow ground ball right back to the pitcher.

The game would now be over. The pitcher picked up the soft grounder
and could have easily thrown the ball to the first baseman. Shay
would have been out and that would have been the end of the game.

Instead, the pitcher threw the ball right over the first baseman's
head, out of reach of all team mates. Everyone from the stands and
both teams started yelling, 'Shay, run to first! Run to first!' Never
in his life had Shay ever run that far, but he made it to first base.
He scampered down the baseline, wide-eyed and startled.

Everyone yelled, 'Run to second, run to second!' Catching his breath,
Shay awkwardly ran towards second, gleaming and struggling to make it
to the base. By the time Shay rounded towards second base, the right
fielder had the ball ... the smallest guy on their team who now had
his first chance to be the hero for his team. He could have thrown
the ball to the second-baseman for the tag, but he understood the
pitcher's intentions so he, too, intentionally threw the ball high
and far over the third-baseman's head. Shay ran toward third base
deliriously as the runners ahead of him circled the bases toward
home.

All were screaming, 'Shay, Shay, Shay, all the Way Shay'

Shay reached third base because the opposing shortstop ran to help
him by turning him in the direction of third base, and shouted, 'Run
to third! Shay, run to third!'

As Shay rounded third, the boys from both teams, and the spectators,
were on their feet screaming, 'Shay, run home! Run home!' Shay ran to
home, stepped on the plate, and was cheered as the hero who hit the
grand slam and won the game for his team.

'That day', said the father softly with tears now rolling down his
face, 'the boys from both teams helped bring a piece of true love and
humanity into this world'.

Shay didn't make it to another summer. He died that winter, having
never forgotten being the hero and making his father so happy, and
coming home and seeing his Mother tearfully embrace her little hero
of the day!

AND NOW A LITTLE FOOTNOTE TO THIS STORY: We all send thousands of
jokes through the e-mail without a second thought, but when it comes
to sending messages about life choices, people hesitate. The crude,
vulgar, and often obscene pass freely through cyberspace, but public
discussion about decency is too often suppressed in our schools and
workplaces.

If you're thinking about forwarding this message, chances are that
you're probably sorting out the people in your address book who
aren't the 'appropriate' ones to receive this type of message. Well,
the person who sent you this believes that we all can make a
difference. We all have thousands of opportunities every single day
to help realize the 'natural order of things.' So many seemingly
trivial interactions between two people present us with a choice: Do
we pass along a little spark of love and humanity or do we pass up
those opportunities and leave the world a little bit colder in the
process?

A wise man once said every society is judged by how it treats it's
least fortunate amongst them.

You now have two choices:
1.. Delete
2. Forward

May your day, be a Shay Day.


Of course my first though was delete this obvious horse-shit, but then I got thinking, where’s the angle. I mean pardon my cynicism but generally stories like this end with a link to a donation site so I googled the author, more of that later.

E-mails like this annoy me. Their sycophantic over the top over-tones just make me want to reach for the barf bucket and exclaim “Sure! in my foot-tapping, get on with it, patented sigh of incredulity”. I’m all for Rudy and the little engine that could but this story is just a bit too far for me arriving into work on a Monday morning with my logistical processes in hoc to the Saturday night before. What really pissed me off was the sheer patronising tone of the whole thing. I felt like Shay’s memory had been raped. Shay wasn’t a hero, he was an object of pity lumbering around those bases while the noble players overthrew the balls. Imagine him tripping around the bases in half gait while everyone high fives each other in the stands, hey, look at us bringing joy to this little handi-cap kid. Woo-hoo. And it doesn’t stop there, Shay passes away from a mysterious illness, writers cramp probably, going out in a blaze of glory just one short paragraph later.

But Shay got me thinking, I guess that was the point. In particular this little ditty.

A wise man once said every society is judged by how it treats it's
least fortunate amongst them.
This is a bastardised version of an old English adage I’ve heard before that you can judge a man by how he treats his servants. It’s probably as old as time itself, how a Roman treats his slaves etc. Well let’s hold hands and have a look at how we, as a people have treated the mental and physically handicapped. At the outset I want to emphasise I have no particular expertise or familiarity with this subject and I’m probably as bigoted as the next man.

The Spartans casually tossed disabled children into a chasm on Mount Taygetos. They weren’t the only ones, the Greeks and the Romans also practised infanticide on the young disabled. These children were seen as cursed by the Gods and I think times may have been a bit leaner to support a child who may not have been able to support themselves. It’s hard to judge these societies by today’s standards so I won’t even try, suffice to say it happened.

What we can judge by today’s standards is the systematic foced sterilisations of the disabled with Good old Uncle Sam leading the way before the Nazi’s got in on the act and carted them all off to be “liquidated”


This wasn’t an isolated event- there is a whole school of thought devoted to these subjects. It’s called Eugenics and it’s members may disturb you. H. G. Wells, Woodrow Wilson, Theodore Roosevelt, Emile Zola, George Bernard Shaw, John Maynard Keynes, William Keith Kellogg, Margaret Sanger, Winston Churchill, and Sidney Webb. I’m telling you, it was all the rage in the roaring twenties. Yes that’s right, the guy that invented Corn Flakes was a bigoted little shit. The US president for whom the Teddy bear was named after was all for trimming the genetic fat.


Every society has to battle with questions of morality. With physically handicapped people it’s simply a matter of supplying the goods. If society has enough means to support them, well it should and it shall. Every mother loves her child. As Christy Brown put it he was just a person trapped in a body that didn’t work. Now, the bit that leads to disagreement are the severely mentally handicapped. Unfortunately for a long time in society such people were segregated, locked away and forgotten about. Personally, I believe this is wrong but I think some objectivity is what this examination needs. Objectively do such people contribute to society? Can they hunt, or work, or exercise any function that brings back to the fold.

Subjectively one could argue that they bring light and love and joy to those that love them. Is that enough, I think it is but do you? It’s a moral issue and one that has divided people for eons and not one I am going to magically conjure any answers to. Ireland hosted the special Olympics and this topic was in the limelight. Reading the opinion pages and letters to the editors one swang between “celebrations of life” and “grotesque matinee of disfigured condescension”. I think if you went and asked those athletes did they enjoy the experience I have no doubt that they did, and they may have developed socially interacting with their fellow athletes. The question is to be examined then, Is their life worth less by their disability be it mental or physical? Are we entitled to draw a distinction between the two? Are all men really created equal. No, but they should be.

Anyway before I get drawn into a circular debate with myself and banish myself to Hell I’m going to go back to the author.

Google brings me EJ Nolan


EJ is a bit of a jack of all trades, I suppose we could loosely file him under “Media chancer”. I found a Bio that I have no doubt was written by “Ed” himself.


Mr. Nowiski as he used to be known before his ethnic name got in the way of his burgeoning international career, apart from having a face for radio and I quote

EJ is writer and producer for Die Laughing Mysteries and the Ringmaster for the Annual Circus of the Stars held in front of Houston City Hall during the Houston Children's Festival in collaboration with the Nerveless Nocks 7th generation Circus Family.His jingles for Sun & Ski Sports and others are currently airing nationally. In his spare time he has written and produced a series of Educational Films on Substance Abuse for Brain Trust Films.

Here’s the bit that grabbed my attention though.

EJ is married to Deborah, Artistic Director of Dionysus Theatre, a theatre troupe for disabled and able-bodied teens and young adults. It was founded in memory of their son, Dustin who died of cancer at age 15 in 1997. They have another son Skyler, who is attending the Guthrie Theatre BFA program at the University of Minnesota.EJ, Deborah and Skyler all performed at the Kennedy Center in Washington DC in the Summer of 2004 to celebrate the passing of the Americans With Disabilities Act.
So Ed’s son, Dustin, died of Cancer aged 15. This puts a new spin on my hereto disregard for E.J’s little fortune cookie fairytale. I can emphasis for his loss and I have to wonder was Dustin disabled? It’s starting to resemble a soap opera here.
I’m reaching for an emotional response and all I have is sadness for poor E.J’s tale. I think that the little proverb of the disabled kid that hit the winner, well, it didn’t happen. Firstly the kid wouldn’t get a shot on that team, never mind at bat to hit the winner. It’s a nice story in the circumstances, bittersweet but we all know deep down that poor Shay wouldn’t have a hope. I think maybe Ed wrote that fairytale for himself. Writing a new memory to be disseminated to spark his own Disney fairytale, but Ed fucked it up. He went too far. In reality Shay would have been happy to swing and miss. There’s nobility in trying, regardless of success but Ed’s been sucked into the American dream and Shay has to hit the winner and we all cry “Foul”. I guess I’m saddened that such an over the top story is reflective of our own attitudes to the disabled. I’d be happy to have Shay on my team and who gives a shit if he strikes out. Why should he be judged on able bodied standards. Why can’t Shay be judged on Shay’s standards, but I know the answer. I’m reminded of Van Martel’s life of Pi where the investigator is given the incredible story and the truth and the fantasy goes into the book. Sometimes it’s better to lie to ourselves and pretend we believed it all along

Tuesday, 10 February 2009

Robbed of Dowrys Made of Smoke

You know in the current economic climate we’re taking it in turns to blame shadowy figures for the unending barrage of negativity that seems to be eking for all sectors. Bankers, politicians, Media hype, and (insert your own personal scapegoat here) taking it in turns to be the victim or our own global “boo-hoo” orgy.

Through my own vigorous research and divinations I can now reveal the mastermind behind our misfortune. One Mr. Walter Elias Disney. It’s the vestiges of Walt’s narcissist ideology that has led us to this place. The thought that Beauty can marry that mean ugly bastard Beast for love and be rewarded with unending “Happy ever afters”, that toiling for two hideously ugly sisters will bring a prince to your door with your missing shoe (that used to be an item of household grocery before midnight?) and the thought that you too are entitled a dreamland where wealth, health and happiness await you all the days of your life.

Walter started in simplier times, in Kansas City animating laugh-o-grams (the cartoons not the drug). He didn’t mean for you lot to take him seriously. He is up there in the misunderstood category with Allah and Jesus who too preached love and compassion and on whose behalf foul and murderous deeds were instigated on man’s fellow man. Walter showed us a magical place, a place of dreams and wonderment. His first animated success in Hollywood came with “Alice Comedies” based on Alice in Wonderland. “Oh Walter, why did they have to follow you down the hole.”

Walters trueism that was taken to heart by his generation’s offshoot was the destruction of the class system and the promotion of self before the collective. A shell shocked generation, weary by war spoiled their children, embellishing their hopes and dreams and the heady, giddy, joys of the sixties were born. When the euphoria wore off and they realised that peace and love wasn’t going to be forthcoming they retreated to middle age and disgruntled servitude but they never forgot that dream and foisted it onto their own children to carry it around like a basket of testicles, ever so gently, so that it may some day shoot forth in a rich creamy orgasm of creation and self indulgence. The dream is Horatio Alger, rags to riches in a day without the lottery but on the back of one’s great and glorious self, talent and hard work are optional add-ons.

There is no other way of explaining the current generation of humans we have fielded on to this burning down planet of ours. Let’s take the top of the pile, our politicians. These are the people we elect by the people from the people to be our responsible governance, to make our laws and dictate our directions. These persons are meant to be representative and the representatives of society. What we have are squabbling children whose whole persona is based around the ego. Bertie Ahern’s policies were so god-damn awful that he ditched them and ran, and won, an entire election on the back of his personality. Just him, the man down the road. The friendly accountant with no bank account and unexplained cash sloshing around won on a horse he can’t even remember. He’s not the only one, Barack Obama, can you name one member of his cabinet besides Hilary, the other bobble head ego? Do you know where he stands on the issues, any issue? Just a thought. It’s just a presidential version of X factor where the winner gets a nice white house and a big shiny red button that they are NEVER supposed to touch. For God-sake, don’t elect Sponge Bob.

Let’s stay on X factor, the gaudiest bobble of the lot. Where the gullible queue in the thousands ready to be packaged, exploited and resold back to the masses. The appeal is that through little talent, no back work and a propensity for Karaoke you can be a global star. A fame prostitute held up as a shiny new penny but one whose value will depreciate until you are cast aside for a new years mint, another cutting on the editing floor. The failing isn’t X factor itself but a clink in the modern human condition. The exploitation of the “me” factor. Girls and camp looking guys have been sleeping in their little glass caskets and are ready to cast it off to live out their days amongst the richness of the fairytale.

In case you think this self promotion is relegated to the lower echelons of society take a look at the banking sector in which self promotion is joined in unholy matrimony with its incestuous brother “entitlement”. That is why bankers in the US have taken the public bail out monies and paid themselves BILLIONS in bonuses. Greed knows no class bounds and self praise is worth a lot more than nothing.

Okay okay, it’s starting to resemble a rant and who has time for all these macro considerations so lets go back to Walter’s happy ending. Love. The cornerstone of society and the inspiration for Beethoven, for Shakespeare and the reason Van Gogh cut off his ear for his sweetheart to mind. The pillaging of collective values has relegated love to a shopping list. Little girls dream of prince charming with a shiny new steed ( a Porsche is good I hear) to come sweep them off their feet so they can have many epidural affected C sectioned children to run around playfully in their Italian marbled summer home in Venice. Let me break it to you now girls, he ain’t coming. As for fella’s, they are no better, they want an angel faced virgin who is naturally born with bedroom tricks that would make a Geisha go for the ice cabinet and a quiet lie down, the ability to let them watch sports when the soaps are on and to never, ever, question where they were when they stumble home, vomit on the couch and then sleep on it. It ain’t gonna happen, she’s gonna kick your hole. Most people now meet their spouse’s on-line these days where they can filter suitors with their own individual style of bigotry. They will promptly invent a cover story more in line with the fairytale. “Oh, we met at a children’s orphanage in Beruit where we were both doing some volunteer work on Christmas day”. You know who you are.

An entire market of bullshit has grown around this promotion of self. Self help books, Self realisation. Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Seminars, weekend retreats all tapping into to this vast, never-ending market of self. How you can realise your unrealistic wants by asking the Universe for it. (By the way, all you have to do is ask the universe and then work really, really hard for it, and it might happen says the author) Is it any wonder that children raised with Santa and the Tooth-fairy don’t want to grow up and want the stream of presents to continue. Do we ever really grow out of being selfish? The key it seems to me is, and wait for it this might be hard to accept. Living in Reality. A little hope is a good thing but we have a disgruntled generation who expect fame and sucess to come knocking on their door. A little humility would be more in line from responsible parents to bestow. The real world is not a fairy-tale. Yes, some of us strike it lucky, but if you examine it more often than not it’s just that, luck. Enterprising individuals that build successful companies have made huge sacrifices in their personal lives for that success. Lawyers, and doctors, you guessed it – study. Everyone is busy peering into other people’s crystal balls and they don’t see the work that went into the little globe or all those jaded persons for whom the dream never happened. Single mothers who are raising children alone because they don’t fit into the fairytale, Cinderella didn’t have no 4 year old. People chasing other kinds of highs living on the streets dying broken and forgotten by our egotistical politicians with us too busy discussing their private lives to poke them about their professional ones. For the record there is a homeless shelter built in Dublin that would house them lying idle due to lack of funds


These are just two examples. It's a way of thinking that has Ireland's public servants threatening industrial action as they are not getting raises when mass amounts of the private sector are being laid of. The old "Fuck them, what about me!" argument that somehow garners sympathy. We’re too busy looking in to bother to look around. Don't believe me? You're wearing shoes probably knitted together by a child halfway across the world, whilst we burn some fossil fuels to fire up the aul computer.

As for me, well I'm no better so I'm off to play the lottery.

Anyway, In case it's all too much of a downer here’s one happy thought from Walt:

Mickey Mouse is concerned about his and Minnie's marriage, and sees a counselor. At the end of the session, the counselor agrees to speak with Minnie.
The counselor says to Mickey "I spoke with your wife, and I must say, I didn't find any evidence of mental instability; she is not crazy."
Mickey says "Crazy!? I never said Minnie is crazy. I said she's fucking Goofy!"